Best of Best

[mehmetcelbis]

Arkada?lar Merhaba

A?a??da baz? screenshotlar göreceksiniz.Bunlar bana göre
Best of besttir.Bakal?m be?enecekmisiniz.

Boeing 747-400
http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/B747_1.jpg

http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/B747_2.jpg

Boeing 767-300 ER
http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/B767.jpg

http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/B7671.jpg

Falcon 50
http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/Falcon.jpg

http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/Falcon1.jpg

http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/Falcon2.jpg

Beechcraft Starship
http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/Beechcraft Starship.jpg

http://flightsimmers.net/airbase/fsturk/Resim/Beechcraft Starship1.jpg

Yukar?da gördü?ünüz uçaklar mükemmel paint yap?m? olarak de?erlendirilmi? olup,
koleksiyonumdan baz?lar?d?r.

Mehmet Celbi?
Painter
www.Fsturk.net

Edited by - mehmetcelbis on 22/07/2002 23:54:57

[epaprat]

Di?erleri de?ilde Lufthansa ve Falcon müthi?...

Ertaç Paprat
TK450 FLYTHY

[biber]

best of the best bence falcon, her aç?dan .
Olaya sadece paint aç?s?ndan yakla?sak bile mükemmel. Sadece external paint de?il tabii ki, uça??n içi de ?aheser.
Hele ?u virtual cockpit'te pilot mahallinden ayr?l?p, kabini gezmiyor musun? , bu Yavigne amcam bu kadar geni? bir hacmi, bu kadar detayl? nas?l boyad? diye hayret ediyor insan.

[epaprat]

?u falconu çok merak ettim payware mi?Link rica etsem.. :)<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle>

Ertaç Paprat
TK450 FLYTHY

[biber]

uça??n resmi sitesi a?a??daki linkte;

http://caea.free.fr/en/simu/falcon502k2.html

Ertaç,

falcon ?ahsi fikrim (ve okudu?um kadar?yla) ?u ana dek yap?lm?? en iyi freeware uçak. Üstelik d?? model, boyama , uçuş dinami?i, system entegrasyonu ve panel yap?m? itibariyle bütün freeware oscarlar? toplar.

Uçak frans?z dassault yap?m? ve kanatlar? mirage sava? uçaklar? dizayn?na parallellik gösteriyor. Bu nedenle bir i? jetinden beklenmeyen manevra kabiliyeti ve "rolling" özelli?i var.

Uça?? tabii msfs learjet'le mukayese etmek insafs?zl?k olur. Özellikle düzgün bir take-off yapmak için manuallar? okumak laz?m. kolayl?k olsun diye ben birkaç ufak nokta ekledim a?a??ya.

Bence herkesin hangar?nda bulunmas? gereken bir uçak. Benim manuel olarak (autopilot'a ba??ml? olmadan) a??z tad?yla kulland???m nadir uçaklardan biri...

-----------------------------------------------------------
The Falcon 50 is known for sluggish take off at full weight, which is why we went to the trouble of making it so. The flaps are extremely draggy on this type. After rotation at around 120 knots clean up the gear and first stage of flap as soon as poss, and initial climb no more than 1,500 fpm at first. Before 180 knots clean up the slats and wait till speed exceeds 210 knots.

You can then climb at 3,400 fpm (per exact specs) at 97.5% N1. Climb is reduced gradually, culminating in UNDER 1000 fpm for the last 3000 feet or so up to FL350, with no more than 99% N1.

Cruise is Mach 0.80 at 98% N1 (acceleration will be slow).

Beware on approach those draggy flaps. Full flap will require between 72 amd 76% N1 for glideslope approach at 126-131 knots. If you allow the speed to fluctuate FS2002's ILS will object.

The Falcon has wings which owe their genesis to the famous Mirage fighters. These supercritical aerofoils have superb rolling characteristics and I have gone someway to reflect this by slightly increasing roll authority at high speeds. The other main observation was that the Falcon 50 shows a marked pitch up in climb, and also pitches up a little in cruise and quite a lot in landing configuration. The former (climb pitch) was easy to achieve, but the latter two were a big challenge,